Al-Qaeda’s Terrifying Vision of a Devastated America

Al-Qaeda’s terrifying vision of a devastated America in the wake of a nuclear attack

Washington is laid to waste. The Capitol is a blackened, smoking ruin. The White House has been razed. Countless thousands are dead.

This is the apocalyptic scene terrorists hope to create if they ever get their hands on a nuclear bomb.

The computer-generated image below was posted on an Islamic extremists’ website yesterday.

This, while rumors are circulating around the Internet that Al Qaeda is urging militants to use weapons of mass destruction to attack the West.

Last night FBI sources said Al Qaeda was desperate to get its hands on a weapon of mass destruction, be it nuclear, chemical, or biological.

So far that is only a dream… or, as the picture above suggests, a nightmare.

Published in: on May 31, 2008 at 7:10 am  Comments (1)  

Why Obama is bad for America

Obama-Rama ::: Reasons Why A Barack Obama Presidency is Bad For This Country

Thanks to Gawfer for the following video that will shock and amaze you about Barack Obama. . .

Barack Obama’s rise to fame is a mystery. He is an unknown, inexperienced junior senator with no accomplishments. There is no content to his speeches. He preaches change for the sake of change, but fails to explain in full how that change will be brought about.

Here is what we do know about Barack Obama.

He claims to be against going to war in Iraq from the beginning. Perhaps he would have voted against it in 2002, had he been there to make a vote. But, in reality, his history of being against the war is hardly a staunch opposition as he claims; and is rather a more nuanced and cautious position on the war than the full-bore opposition.

He has repeatedly told America that as president he will end the war, leaving us to believe he will conduct an immediate withdrawal of all troops, leaving Iraq bare and unprotected, an action that even Joe Lieberman claims would create a more dangerous world, and create a safe haven for terrorists. Question: Mr. Obama, if we pull out of Iraq, what do you think will happen after that? Utopia?

Recently, Barack Obama has been urging us to negotiate with the terrorists, to sit down and have a heart to heart talk with the Islamic Jihad and the nations that sponsor such terrorism.

In a rational world with a rational enemy, Mr. Obama’s recommendation would be a solid one. Of course it is better to try to talk things out with someone before committing to a bloody battle or war. We tell our kids to talk before fighting. We talked to the Soviets. We talked to China. Of course, when the left uses those examples, they fail to recognize that it wasn’t presidential visits with the Soviet Union that brought down the Berlin Wall. The Soviet Union collapsed because President Ronald Reagan bankrupted the Soviet Union with a military buildup. And we didn’t decide to talk to the Chinese because we feared them. We talked with the Chinese because we wanted to drive a wedge between them and the Soviet Union.

Besides, Islam is not an ideology of rationality. They have committed to eradicating Israel, and destroying The West.

In his inexperience, Barack Obama has not thought through this issue. By his statements on foreign policy he is showing America how new to this he really is. And folks, inexperience like this is the last thing we need in the White House when it comes to foreign policy during a time of war with an enemy like none we have ever faced before.

A premature pull-out of Iraq would essentially be handing over Iraq to the Islamic Jihad so that the region could be a base of operations for terrorist activity, as well as providing additional funding for their ambitions of world domination by way of Iraq’s oil riches. A withdrawal from Iraq would also send the message that America is unwilling to complete its commitments, and that when faced with the adversity of a ruthless enemy, we are weak and are willing to turn-tail and run.

But the reasons for not withdrawing from the region prematurely goes deeper than that. One must enter the mind of the Islamic Jihadists to understand the mentality of who we are dealing with, and why withdrawal, or negotiations with an enemy that brings nothing to the table except the will to defeat us, would be disastrous.

I believe that Islam is an inherently violent religion, but that there is a large number of Muslims who are unaware of Muhammad’s evil actions and his call to violence. Islamic clerics are loath to teach their people about their faith’s dark deeds. Islam has made itself an enemy to all that does not adhere to its rules, and only understands violence as a means of dealing with its enemy. Only strength will be successful against the Islamic threat, and concessions, negotiations, and the withdrawal of forces is seen as a weakness by the Jihadists. And signs of weakness are answered with aggressive action.

Answer me this. After Israel pulled out of Gaza, how long did it take before Hamas proclaimed victory, and then began lobbing rockets over the border at Israel?

Barack Obama has also indicated that he plans to cut investments in “unproven missile defense systems.”

That’s brilliant. The missile defense system, for one, is not unproven – in fact, our technology along those lines was crucial in bringing down a crippled satellite recently. Besides, if you are so determined to rid the world of nuclear weapons, why would you discontinue a program that would essentially make long-range missiles obsolete?

He also wishes to slow the development of future combat systems.

Uh, Mr. Obama, how do you wish this nation to defend itself? With sticks and stones? Believe it or not, talking doesn’t work with irrational tyrants. Just ask Neville Chamberlain.

Unilateral disarmament does not work, either, Barack. If we disarm, the enemy must do the same as well. If they don’t, and we do, they will perceive themselves as stronger, and attack. That, Mr. Obama, is how tyrants in the real world play the game.

Obama supports the gruesome partial-birth abortion. Partial Birth Abortion is killing a child in the womb that is far enough along in pregnancy to survive outside the womb. Any abortion, in my opinion, is murder, but “late term abortion” is especially horrid.

I am taking Obama’s word that he is not Muslim. However, Barack Obama was raised around the Muslim culture, and one’s life experiences shape who you are. Therefore, though Barack Hussein Obama may not be Muslim, because of his upbringing, he will undoubtedly be sympathetic to Islam. And as I stated earlier, Islam is a religion rooted in violence and hate dreamed up by a murderous pedophile named Muhammed. The jihadists have a very real goal of converting us to their false religion, or destroying us in the process, and any sympathy to this murderous enemy is foolish, and irresponsible. I wonder, though, considering all of the Muslims in Obama’s life, how the Islamic Jihadists view Obama. Do they see him as a fellow Muslim? Or an apostate?

Understand, I realize that not all of the citizens of these Islamic Dictatorships are the problem. In fact, the population of Iran is very pro-American (residual from the popularity of the Shah, and his pro-American attitude), and Christianity is the fastest growing religion in that country.

When we entered World War II we did not go to war against the German People, but against Nazism and Fascism. Now, we are at war with Islamism, a fascist tyranny spreading across the globe, and Barack Obama’s weakness regarding Foreign Policy (lack of experience, talking to the irrational) would place us in great jeopardy.

That’s not even counting his liberal viewpoints of Government Control over the citizens, a Health Care program similar to Europe and Canada’s Universal Health Programs (think about it: do you really want the same government that runs DMV to run your health insurance programs?). If the current health insurance system is so bad, then why would government wish to keep the same model, but change the payer of that system over to the same government who didn’t get the postal service running in New Orleans until 3 months after Hurricane Katrina, while Federal Express was delivering to the area in a week, and UPS in three weeks? (source: Winning the Future by Newt Gingrich)

Of course this is a man that is a member of the Democrat Party, the same party that has decided Income Taxes Are Voluntary, even though you are forced to pay them (Reid idiocy):

The Government Should Seize Control of our Oil Companies as Hugo Chavez has:

Our Troops are Cold Blooded Killers:

and is content with emboldening the enemy:

Barack Obama is not even willing to take McCain up on his offer of the two of them going to Iraq to see what’s going on first hand. Amazing, isn’t it? Obama wants to talk to the enemy before he’s willing to talk to any Republican, or go and see for himself how Iraq is going.

Published in: on May 29, 2008 at 5:53 am  Comments (220)  

Memorial Day and Free Ramos & Compean Rally

Memorial Day Tribute to Heroes, and Audio of Interviews with attendees of Anti-Illegal Immigration Rally in California

Memorial Day means more than bar-b-qued hamburgers and hot dogs. It is more than just a day off from work. Memorial Day is a time to thank those who have sacrificed their lives for this nation, and a time to thank those who are currently laying it all on the line everyday to keep this nation safe. These men and women are most deserving of our deepest respect and gratitude for all they have done on behalf of our great country.

It is my sincere hope that everybody takes the time to pay tribute to those heroes who have paid the ultimate sacrifice while protecting our freedom, and also recognize the tremendous sacrifices that our Veterans have made and our active duty troops are making everyday.

Simple words cannot convey my gratitude. As a veteran myself I understand the oath, and I understand the difficult journey. However, as a peace-time veteran, I will never fully understand the taste of freedom that graces the hearts and souls of our war-time veterans, and the brave men and women currently serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

In fact, there are only two words that I can say that truly relay how I feel. They are simple words, insignificant by themselves, but filled with emotion and honor when placed together and delivered to a member of the United States Military.

Thank You.


Tonight on Political Pistachio Radio we will pay tribute to those fine members of the military, past and present, living and dead. I encourage the veterans that read this site and listen to the show to call in so that we may thank you personally.


The men and women that protect this nation serve in many more ways other than the military. Our Border Patrol is also an agency tasked with keeping us as a nation safe, not only from illegal immigrants who have broken the law to be here and are tapping into a system they have neither contributed to, nor have the legal right to access, but the Border Patrol also protects us from members of enemy Islamic factions and Mexican drug cartels. One out of three persons crossing the border along the San Diego county line are of Middle Eastern descent. The Drug Cartels in Mexico are at war with the government and each other, and that war is attempting to spill over into this country. The Border Patrol is our line of defense against both of these dangers. Unfortunately, our government, which is fast becoming a judicial oligarchy, has determined that if Border Patrol Agents do their job, their actions are punishable by prison.

Two Border Patrol agents, Ignacio Ramos and Jose Compean, attempting to interrupt a cross-border drug smuggling operation, fired their weapons in self-defense at an admitted illegal alien, drug smuggler, Osbaldo Aldrete-Davila. The smuggler managed to escape across the border into Mexico, but he left his vehicle, loaded with more than 700 pounds of marijuana. It was another good bust. Rather than be congratulated for doing their job, the Border Patrol agents were charged with attempted murder, indicted, placed under house arrest for eight long months. The two agents were later sentenced to 11 and 12 years in federal prison, respectively, on charges of assault with a deadly weapon and for violation of the drug smuggler’s civil rights. They remain in prison serving their unfair sentence that President George W. Bush could pardon, but won’t because of his globalistic position, and lack of cajones against the liberal left which would lambaste him if he so dared.

Last Friday I attended a Free Ramos and Compean Sidewalk Rally in Irvine, California near where First Lady Laura Bush was autographing copies of the book she authored with Jenna Bush, “Read All About It!” While I was there I interviewed a number of the folks holding up signs and waving American Flags in support of our unjustly jailed Border Patrol Agents, Ramos and Compean. Tonight on Political Pistachio Radio, after the tribute to our American Military Heroes, past and present, I will play for you the audio of those interviews. Don’t miss this broadcast! This will be a show you will remember for a lifetime.

Join us tonight at 10:00 PM Eastern Time on Political Pistachio Radio.

Below are photos I took from the Rally. The first is of the line waiting to meet Laura Bush. The last picture is of a woman born in South America who declares proudly she is an American, and she is the final, stirring interview you will hear tonight.

Cross-Posted on Heading Right, and various other members of the Political Pistachio Network.

Published in: on May 26, 2008 at 4:33 pm  Leave a Comment  

Fire on American Aircraft Carrier

24 Sailors Injured During Fire Aboard U.S. Aircraft Carrier George Washington

The USS George Washington, CVN-73, was previously homeported in Norfolk, Virginia. Her new homeport is Yokosuka, Japan, and while on her way to that new home, while conducting a routine replenishment operation in the Pacific Ocean, a fire broke out. The fire aboard the USS George Washington injured 24 sailors. None of the injuries were serious, although one sailor was treated for first-degree burns and the others were treated for heat stress.

When the fire broke out the crew of the George Washington was at general quarters (high alert, “All Hands Man Your Battle Stations”) for 12 hours. The location of the fire was in an aft space where the air conditioning, refrigeration, and boiler room is located. The fire spread to a number of spaces in the vicinity, but it did not damage the carrier’s nuclear propulsion plant.

The U.S. Navy Aircraft Carrier remains able to continue forward with full propulsion capability. Her next fleet stop is San Diego. The new homeport of Yokosuka, Japan will follow, where she will be homeported so that she may relieve USS Kitty Hawk, and formerly San Diego homebased vessel before her stint in Japan, in the Western Pacific.

The cause of the fire aboard the USS George Washington remains unknown, but is under investigation. It took sailors several hours to extinguish the blaze. Fighting fire aboard a Navy ship is heavily trained for, and enlists all hands in the effort.

Published in: on May 24, 2008 at 4:03 pm  Comments (1)  

Russian Communists Offended by Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull

Indiana Jones Offends Communists – Offensive? To Commies? Jeeeeez!

Are you offended by the truth? Well, if you are Russia, and if your distorted revision of history is challenged by Indiana Jones and the latest movie “Indiana Jones and the Kingdom of the Crystal Skull,” all you have to do is ban the movie.

That’s right, now that we live in a society that is offended by everything under the sun, it is no surprise that Russian communists are all up in arms about a movie that dares base its story around the fact that the Soviet Union “made trouble” for the United States and her allies.

After all, it’s not like the Russian communists had missiles pointed at the U.S., or were engaging in a propaganda war that distorted history and demonized American interests. In fact, by responding in this way aren’t the Russians admitting to submission to Western Ideals? After all, apparently they have adopted the idiotic Western tendency to be offended by everything, and proclaim political correctness, rather than suck it up and admit that their history is one of violence, totalitarianism, and a desire for world domination.

There is a reason that the ranks of the once powerful Communist Party has dwindled since Soviet times. However, the remaining members feel they are now tasked with defending the achievements of the old Soviet Union, no matter how sparse those achievements seem to be.

But isn’t that what suppressive governments do? Isn’t it a normal reaction for an oppressive government to ban anything that brings their style of government into question?

Russia, thanks for proving our point.

Published in: on May 24, 2008 at 1:37 pm  Leave a Comment  

What is appeasement?

What Is Appeasement? (Now that’s a word that makes the left go nuts!)

The American Heritage College Dictionary on my desk defines “Appeasement” as:

The Policy of granting concessions to potential enemies to maintain peace. (Often at the expense of principal).

Many Liberals are claiming that when Bush said in his appeasement speech, “Some seem to believe that we should negotiate with the terrorists and radicals, as if some ingenious argument will persuade them they have been wrong all along,” he was referring directly to Barack Obama. Perhaps. I won’t claim to know what was going on in the president’s mind at the time. But references to Neville Chamberlain about his talks with Hitler, and the claim that “. . . we should negotiate with terrorists” is not appeasement by the above definition. However, that does not mean that appeasement is not attached in some way.

What made Neville Chamberlain’s actions those of appeasement was not his negotiations alone, but the fact that in those negotiations he gave Hitler concessions in order to keep him from advancing further. The appeasement did not work. Shortly after, Germany invaded Poland, and the world realized that Hitler was not going to stop there, and was plunged into a second world war.

So, here is the next question: Is Barack Obama’s potential policies appeasement?

The answer is a resounding yes. A U.S. withdrawal, as Obama is calling for, from Iraq is a concession – a gift to the terrorists, if you may. It is essentially saying to the enemy, “We give you Iraq if you will just be nice from here on out.”

The Democrats and Republicans alike, however, are guilty of appeasement – even Bush. After all, the president and Condi Rice’s peace talks between Israel and the Palestinian Authority is a discussion of convincing Israel to give up land for peace, isn’t it?

And what happened the moment Israel pulled out of Gaza?

Hamas took advantage, took control of the region, and their attacks against Israel increased.

Appeasement is dangerous, and appeasement only delays the inevitable – often making matters worse because it legitimatizes the regimes, and emboldens the enemy.

Does that mean there should be no talks at all?

Talks are ongoing. Obviously, there is constant communication – but public negotiations with states that sponsor terrorism sends the wrong message – – – but Barack Obama is too inexperienced to realize it.

Published in: on May 20, 2008 at 5:12 am  Leave a Comment  

Communism, Liberalism, Islamism, and the List of 45

The Enemy Within – The List of 45

The United States of America was founded on principles and values that have enabled this nation to become something exceptional. The United States, as a result of its moral values, and careful attention to freedom with responsibility, has become the greatest nation on the face of the earth. The Constitutional and Christian heritage of this nation has made America prosper, and become the nation that people from around the world desire to immigrate to. And now, the liberals would like you to join them as they try to change it.

Change for the sake of change is not positive change. Empty change, like the Obama campaign promises, is change that will place our fine nation in jeopardy, and in a position of vulnerability that we simply cannot afford.

This is not to say that some kind of change is not needed. The governmental system during the last century has slowly deteriorated through creeping incrementalism from a government for the people and by the people to a judicial oligarchy ruled by an appointed bench of judges. The governmental system has wandered away from its Constitutional beginnings, and is broken in many ways. Because of this deterioration, we do need to enact positive change. However, this kind of change, unlike the liberal left’s change for the sake of change, will not come easily. Forces are already in place to combat such change. Any positive change worth having, complete with attacks from the left, is change we will have to fight for.

Americans, partially due to the disease of political correctness, and partially due to a society filled with individuals that won’t take responsibility for their own actions or stupidity, and have learned to depend on the courts for justification of their errant ways, have been compromised by compromise. The consequences of our compromise are upon us. Society is scrambling to fix the decay with nanny-state legislation, and is willing to enact change, any change, for the sake of change. In the process of trying to correct the decay of our society and government, we are digging ourselves deeper into a pit of ruin.

Restoration of our once uncompromised republic is nearly out of sight and beyond our reach. The liberal left’s quest for everyone to simply get along with one another has been used and abused to perfection. The liberal left has joined into lock-step (or should I say “goose-step”) quite efficiently with the enemies of freedom and liberty, and they don’t even realize it.

Or, perhaps they do.

In 1963 the communist goals for the take over of America from within were entered into the Congressional Record by Albert Herlong, Jr. Communist China and the Soviet Union were the enemy of the day. The generation enduring The Cold War at that time was the same generation that had fought the war against Nazi fascism in World War II, and that war with the axis powers was still fresh in their minds.

The communist invasion, however, would be different. They invaded us from within. However, due to the brilliance of President Ronald Reagan, The Cold War was won by The West. Therefore, we no longer had to worry about the fascist communist infiltration from within. . . Right?

A new enemy has emerged, recently. The new enemy, Islam, is an old enemy fueled by a violent ideology dating back to the seventh century. Islam has been observant during these many years, watching history, learning the best way to bring down The West. They have discovered that their best method is through the useful idiots of the liberal left, and their own fascist agendas that cling well to the list of 45 communist goals for bringing down America.

The threat of fascism through liberalism and Islamism is not as apparent as it was with Nazi Germany or fascist Japan. But the threat is alive and being used efficiently by today’s Left. After all, fascism is a counterfeiter. It is a method of pointing fingers and using the art of misdirection. Liberals tell you that fascism can only come from the right. I say that this is yet another attempt to misdirect, and fool you to march to the voting booth in the wrong political direction.

Fascism comes from a position of popularity. It is a drug that comes upon the people without them even realizing it. It declares that it is for the good of the country, using creeping incrementalism to slowly indoctrinate the people. Fascism claims it is the wave of the future, that it is progressive, and that it represents much needed change that is a long time in coming. Fascism is exciting, young, and preaches that it is ready to fix whatever is broken by applying new ideas that the old, uptight and old-fashioned generations are not capable of.

Nazism, of course, is the best example of how fascism easily gains control over an unsuspecting populace. The Nazi Party in post-war Germany promised the people that Germany would rise to prominence from the ashes of World War I. The Nazi government would eliminate those at fault for the crushing defeat, clamp down on big business, and end the class struggle. 59% of Environmental Conversationalists joined the party, as did cultural elites, the youth, and the lower classes. Why not? After all, the Nazis portrayed themselves as on the side of progress, protecting the environment, protecting the poor, preaching unity, togetherness, and an end to division.

Sounds familiar, doesn’t it?

Don’t misunderstand me. I am not suggesting that if you are concerned about the environment, or desire that everybody just get along, that it automatically makes you a fascist. I am suggesting, however, that each of those desires, which are noble in their own right, can be used to stir up an uncompromising will to stamp out individual freedoms – and it begins with a nanny-state not much unlike the one that the liberal left is attempting to create as you read this.

Over the years the liberal elites have forged a plan for socialism that began to become apparent during the last century. After Franklin Delano Roosevelt’s social programs the movement swung into high gear. The liberals have pioneered the reengineering of America by compromising the U.S. Constitution and promising a better life with their new and more intrusive government programs, such as socialized medicine.

Each election cycle produces grander socialist wealth redistribution policies, drawing more and more people into the grand scheme, quietly, and at the tiny little price of compromising our core principles, and individual liberties.

Our descent into a socialist nanny-state is alarming. So much so that the liberal left, upon reading this, will laugh and declare that I am being a typical right-wing nut, unable to fathom the larger picture.

The broad picture is that as the Democratic Party moves farther to the left, it is dragging the Republican Party to the left with it. As an American I am recognizing a recurring historical theme happening here in America right now. It occurred in Nazi Germany, Communist Russia, Cuba, and China. The battle lines have been drawn. What the liberal left is doing is simply no surprise because it has happened before.

This is where the list of 45 comes into play. If you will remember, the list of 45 was submitted to congressional record over 40 years ago. As you go through the list, think about how many of the goals the liberal left is trying to push on us in today’s America. Also, keep in mind how many of them Islam is using as well. Realize that liberalism and Islam has made small changes, like in the first two, they have replaced the word “atomic” with the word “any.”

And without further delay, here it is, The List of 45:

[From “The Naked Communist,” by Cleon Skousen]


1. U.S. acceptance of coexistence as the only alternative to atomic war.

2. U.S. willingness to capitulate in preference to engaging in atomic war.

3. Develop the illusion that total disarmament [by] the United States would be a demonstration of moral strength.

4. Permit free trade between all nations regardless of Communist affiliation and regardless of whether or not items could be used for war.

5. Extension of long-term loans to Russia and Soviet satellites.

6. Provide American aid to all nations regardless of Communist domination.

7. Grant recognition of Red China. Admission of Red China to the U.N.

8. Set up East and West Germany as separate states in spite of Khrushchev’s promise in 1955 to settle the German question by free elections under supervision of the U.N.

9. Prolong the conferences to ban atomic tests because the United States has agreed to suspend tests as long as negotiations are in progress.

10. Allow all Soviet satellites individual representation in the U.N.

11. Promote the U.N. as the only hope for mankind. If its charter is rewritten, demand that it be set up as a one-world government with its own independent armed forces. (Some Communist leaders believe the world can be taken over as easily by the U.N. as by Moscow. Sometimes these two centers compete with each other as they are now doing in the Congo.)

12. Resist any attempt to outlaw the Communist Party.

13. Do away with all loyalty oaths.

14. Continue giving Russia access to the U.S. Patent Office.

15. Capture one or both of the political parties in the United States.

16. Use technical decisions of the courts to weaken basic American institutions by claiming their activities violate civil rights.

17. Get control of the schools. Use them as transmission belts for socialism and current Communist propaganda. Soften the curriculum. Get control of teachers’ associations. Put the party line in textbooks.

18. Gain control of all student newspapers.

19. Use student riots to foment public protests against programs or organizations which are under Communist attack.

20. Infiltrate the press. Get control of book-review assignments, editorial writing, policy making positions.

21. Gain control of key positions in radio, TV, and motion pictures.

22. Continue discrediting American culture by degrading all forms of artistic expression. An American Communist cell was told to “eliminate all good sculpture from parks and buildings, substitute shapeless, awkward and meaningless forms.”

23. Control art critics and directors of art museums. “Our plan is to promote ugliness, repulsive, meaningless art.”

24. Eliminate all laws governing obscenity by calling them “censorship” and a violation of free speech and free press.

25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.

26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as “normal, natural, healthy.”

27. Infiltrate the churches and replace revealed religion with “social” religion. Discredit the Bible and emphasize the need for intellectual maturity which does not need a “religious crutch.”

28. Eliminate prayer or any phase of religious expression in the schools on the ground that it violates the principle of “separation of church and state.”

29. Discredit the American Constitution by calling it inadequate, old-fashioned, out of step with modern needs, a hindrance to cooperation between nations on a worldwide basis.

30. Discredit the American Founding Fathers. Present them as selfish aristocrats who had no concern for the “common man.”

31. Belittle all forms of American culture and discourage the teaching of American history on the ground that it was only a minor part of the “big picture.” Give more emphasis to Russian history since the Communists took over.

32. Support any socialist movement to give centralized control over any part of the culture–education, social agencies, welfare programs, mental health clinics, etc.

33. Eliminate all laws or procedures which interfere with the operation of the Communist apparatus.

34. Eliminate the House Committee on Un-American Activities.

35. Discredit and eventually dismantle the FBI.

36. Infiltrate and gain control of more unions.

37. Infiltrate and gain control of big business.

38. Transfer some of the powers of arrest from the police to social agencies. Treat all behavioral problems as psychiatric disorders which no one but psychiatrists can understand [or treat].

39. Dominate the psychiatric profession and use mental health laws as a means of gaining coercive control over those who oppose Communist goals.

40. Discredit the family as an institution. Encourage promiscuity and easy divorce.

41. Emphasize the need to raise children away from the negative influence of parents. Attribute prejudices, mental blocks and retarding of children to suppressive influence of parents.

42. Create the impression that violence and insurrection are legitimate aspects of the American tradition; that students and special-interest groups should rise up and use [“]united force[“] to solve economic, political or social problems.

43. Overthrow all colonial governments before native populations are ready for self-government.

44. Internationalize the Panama Canal.

45. Repeal the Connally reservation so the United States cannot prevent the World Court from seizing jurisdiction [over domestic problems. Give the World Court jurisdiction] over nations and individuals alike.


As an added note, I first came across this list at A Newt One, and have found a cataloguing of the list at Eeevil Conservative’s site (well, she directed me to it when she heard of my interest in the list). Also, last Saturday, Snooper of A Newt One, and a panel of others, went through the first half of the list on Political Pistachio Radio. We will complete our commentary on the list this coming Saturday at 10:00 PM Eastern Time.

Published in: on May 19, 2008 at 7:05 am  Leave a Comment  

A Taste Of Political Pistachio News

For those of you that do not visit my News Site, I thought I would bring you a quick taste of what I do over there daily:

Faith, Suicide, Gay Marriage, U.N. Investigates Racism in the U.S.

Obama ‘Faith’ Flier Hints at General Election Strategy – – – Barack Obama has a flier out in Kentucky that addresses his faith and his attempts to fulfill “God’s will” — and it could be a sign that the Illinois senator is returning to his religious roots as he gears up for a general election battle. Remember when Huckabee was chided for putting a Christian Cross in one of his election ads? Oh, the hypocrisy of it all.

MySpace Suicide Case Could Make Us All Criminals – – – Think twice before you sign up for an online service using a fake name or e-mail address. You could be committing a federal crime. And be careful what you say, it may land you in jail later. . . Don’t get me wrong, the people in this story that apparently drove this girl to suicide should be prosecuted because what they did was mean and wrong, but where is the line? Did they actually make the girl commit suicide? Or was that a decision the girl made, and what happened simply sped up the decision? How dangerous will it become for us to say anything to anybody, thus allowing someone to proclaim that our words made them do something, hence making it a criminal offense?

Why California Gay Marriage Ruling is Bad – – – A California Court overturned the state’s ban on gay marriage and it is a very bad thing for our society. More specifically, the courts overturned the will of the people.

U.N. racism investigator to visit U.S. from Monday – – – A special U.N. human rights investigator will visit the United States this month to probe racism, an issue that has forced its way into the race to secure the Democratic Party’s presidential nomination. What? How dare the U.N. think they have jurisdiction over us, and second, it is the Democrats that dragged “race” into this election. I can’t stand Obama because of his political positions. I could care less if he’s half-black, all black, or a purple shade of gray.

U.S. Should Engage Iran With Incentives, Pressure – – – The United States should construct a combination of incentives and pressure to engage Iran, and may have missed earlier opportunities to begin a useful dialogue with Tehran, Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates said yesterday. But remember, like when disciplining your children, we cannot use idle threats. If Iran refuses to abide by the provisions of the negotiations, we have to be willing to engage them militarily.

Bush Interrogation Rules of Detainees – – – Video of the hearing where legal scholars testified about the detention of terror suspects by the U.S.

New Starbucks’ Logo causing outrage among some Christian Groups – – – Apparently one person’s smut is another person’s latte. The new logo, I don’t think, is that big of a deal. What I am wondering is since Starbucks has abandoned the old green label for this new revealing black and white logo, are the “Think Green” Al Gore followers going to be all up in arms?

Remember when Obama said there is 57 states? – – – Perhaps he was referring to the 57 member-states of the Organization of the Islamic Conference. Go ahead, count them, there are 57. Okay, perhaps this is just a coincidence. Obama would never have anything Muslim on his mind, right?

2008 Joint Service Open House Air Show – – – Featuring the Navy Blue Angels and other exciting attractions this weekend, with free admission and free parking.

There is no crisis with falling prices – – – But when the government oversteps its bounds and sticks its hands into the economic world . . .

Published in: on May 17, 2008 at 2:47 pm  Leave a Comment  

Olbermann’s Meltdown Audio Clip and Commentary

Keith Olbermann Meltdown Audio and Commentary

Keith Olberman’s recommendation that President Bush “Shut the hell up” ended a ten minute rant that makes me wonder if Olberman has all of his marbles in place.

I know that Olbermann and Obama desire a world without weapons and war, and a world where the United States is not the military leader of the world. They abhor our nuclear capabilities, and they are ashamed of America’s exceptional position in the world as a leader and as the planet’s greatest nation.

People like Barrack Hussein Obama and Keith Olbermann have aligned themselves with the New Age freaks, foreseeing the next step in humanity’s evolution, a world without poverty, without the need for a military, and the opportunity for the evolution of the species where one experiences oneness and solidarity in a fantastical liberal utopia.

Olbermann claims that anyone disagreeing with him, or supporting any part of the George W. Bush Administration, is living in a fantasy world, and is not rooted in the realm of reality.

All of this whining and freaking out by the liberal left has erupted because George W. Bush made a statement indicating that the Islamic Jihad is the enemy of our generation, and compares those that are calling for withdrawal and calling for peaceful, heart-warming talks with the enemy, to the appeasers of Hitler in World War II, and more specifically, Neville Chamberlain.

Well, Mr. Olbermann, sir, it is you that is living in a fantasy world that is not rooted in reality. It is you that fails to understand that the purveyors of Islam, the religion of hate and violence, does not care what you say or do. All that the members of the Islamic Jihad wish to accomplish is to either convert you into a soldier of terror, or kill you. Honestly, I would love to live in a world of peace and safety, where weapons of mass destruction are a relic of distant history. I would appreciate a worldwide society where humankind has advanced to the point that a simple discussion or negotiation is all that is required to avert a deadly war. But, you see, Mr. Olbermann (and all of you liberals out there reading this), I reside in a world of reality where there is a ruthless enemy that could care less about what you wish for or desire. The enemy’s utopia is much different than the utopia you envision. Their’s is one in which you are dead, and America is ruled by Sharia Law.

Listen to the audio of MSNBC host Olbermann’s unhinged rant, combined with my commentary (and the commentary of a few of my listeners), on Political Pistachio Radio – Your home for conservative news and commentary.

Published in: on May 17, 2008 at 6:20 am  Leave a Comment  

Hate Crime Laws and the Gay Agenda

Criticize Homosexuality, Lose Your Job

After writing a column critical of gay rights in a local publication, an administrator for the University of Toledo was fired. The column was in response to another column written a couple weeks earlier that was pro-gay. In response, the President of the University of Toledo wrote his own column to distance the fired administrator’s views from those of the University.

Perhaps the parent being banned from dropping off or pick up his children from school; attending his children’s sports events or other school activities; meeting with his children’s teachers at parent-teacher conferences; attending or participating in school committee meetings; or even voting on election day at his local polling place, a public school because he criticized and requested his child be removed from the teaching of the gay agenda, is something that will catch our attention. How crazy is it that he wanted to protect his child from what he felt was against his belief system, and this happened. Could you imagine the outcry if the circumstances had been reversed? In this case, specifically: A no-trespass order issued against him by the school – which includes all district property – is “simply an intimidation tactic” against anyone who might protest the school’s pro-homosexual policies regarding elementary school children.

On KFMB AM Radio a little over a week ago I heard a story about how a mother is under investigation for a hate crime because her child asked her about homosexuality, she stated being gay is a sin, and then when the child repeated it at school the teacher turned in the parent for a hate crime.

How long before, under the guise of Hate Crime Laws, will it be until the government is knocking down your door to take away your Bible because they consider it to be a hate crime document because it proclaims homosexuality is a sin?

How many freedoms must we lose before Americans recognize the insanity?

Orwell’s 1984?

Hmmmmm. Thought Crime Legislation is on its way.

Published in: on May 14, 2008 at 6:32 am  Leave a Comment